What’s Driving Automotive Storage?

Release time:2017-06-13
source:EE Times

In addition to rapidly changing infotainment systems, more connected cars, ADAS and autonomous cars are drastically altering automakers' requirements for local on-board storage in the vehicle.

For many buyers, the technology package in the car is becoming a greater buying incentive than the engine and other mechanical components.

In the last 20 years or so, we have seen a transition from cars with minimal electronic content, to electric and hybrid drivetrains with dozens of independent computers controlling everything from the door locks to the battery, and from climate control to engine, suspension and control systems used for reliability and safety.

The high volume of data generated from these systems is placing greater focus on storage strategies.

Of particular importance is local on-board storage in the vehicle. The need for high capacity storage optimized for the rigorous demands of the automotive environment promises to only accelerate, as the breadth and complexity of the software-driven features in cars evolve. Such a trend will become even more pronouced, as more cars are connected to the Internet, and in particular, we move closer to transitioning to semi-autonomous and autonomous drive.
Soon, more advanced autonomous vehicles may have on-board local storage capacity needs of one terabyte or higher.

To date, infotainment and navigation have been major drivers of the need for high-performance automobile computing systems and in-vehicle storage.

In recent years, the evolution of these systems drove several shifts in storage demands, first from optical drives (mostly for map data) to flash memory card-based storage systems, then to higher capacities of flash storage in the form embedded flash drives (EFDs) inside of these systems for bigger data collections and higher-definition content.

As the advancement of these systems continue, it raises the question of what will happen to local storage requirements as these systems connect to smartphones and the cloud.
Gap in development cycles.

Consumers are used to smartphone and tablet experiences where the hardware is replaced every couple of years and software apps can be updated on a weekly basis.

Automakers have struggled to keep up with these trends. The development cycle for an automotive infotainment system can be upwards of three years, so when the technology is introduced, it can actually already be a generation out-of-date compared to the consumer electronics market. While the production version of the infotainment system is typically expected to last the model life of the car, which can be five years or more, it may, in fact, become quickly obsolete.

On the rise are integration technologies that connect drivers’ phones with the car’s infotainment system to run a subset of third-party applications using the screen and interface buttons.

However, using a smartphone and a small screen a few inches from your eyes is very different than using an application while you are driving a car. There is still a huge role for the automakers'infotainment systems to deliver an experience optimized for the in-car environment. Part of future-proofing the infotainment system in an automobile includes ensuring adequate storage capacity to download and manage new applications, as well as to ensure that the hardware is designed for the 10 to 15-year life, rather than the typical few-years of life that is common with consumer electronics products.

Edge vs. cloud

The cloud has become integral to mobile device computing and shows promise for in-car connected systems as well. That begs to ask the question: “If everything can be stored and run from the cloud, why do users need to store it locally?”

The cloud plays a role in managing and updating devices, as well as backing-up and collecting data. However, we have all experienced latency issues when moving data from the cloud (such as watching movies at peak times, data limitations on carriers data plans or even a lack of connectivity), which remind us that a connected car is not truly connected all of the time, nor is it optimally connected when it is connected.

Other industries, such as cable TV, have gone through a detailed analysis of cloud versus gateway versus edge storage – to optimize cost, performance and reliability – and, as the automotive makers and service providers move to the connected world, similar analysis and tradeoffs will need to be made.

In general, increasing the amount of storage at the edge, and making local decisions on what data is needed to be transmitted to the cloud, can lead to a more responsive and optimized solution.

Advanced connected cars can collect nearly a gigabyte of data per second. In fact, Gartner estimates that by 2020 connected and autonomous car data traffic per vehicle may reach over 280 petabytes, or 280 million gigabytes, annually. It is unrealistic to expect that this much data can be effectively and efficiently transmitted back to cloud servers. An edge flash memory-based solution optimized for recording could solve many of these problems.

Stringent automotive environment

The automotive environment creates very unique challenges. For example, the temperature range in which a device is expected to work is very different from an air-conditioned server room and, as processing power at the edge increases, heat from other components in the box are also driving requirements for more extreme operating temperatures. Data retention in flash memory storage is impacted by temperature, so special design approaches are needed to ensure that these devices can endure the next generation of automotive applications.

Automotive compute and storage systems also need to boot at very low temperatures, which also poses unique design challenges – not just in the memory itself, but in the controllers that manage the raw flash memory.

Additionally, the reliability requirements in the automotive world are substantially higher, and as storage migrates from infotainment to systems where lives are potentially at risk (such as auto-pilot functionality), those requirements become even more stringent. These demanding environments also dictate a very different approach to the memory device, starting with the design process and architecture itself. Merely adding quality through a screening process is not adequate for these applications.

The connected car will advance the state of our lives in the same way connected consumer devices (like smartphones) have done in recent years. As the electronics content in automobiles increases, storage leaders and local (or edge) storage optimized for this the rapidly evolving industry will play an increasingly important role in bringing to life the vision of the connected car.

Online messageinquiry

According to the latest research by TrendForce, the demand for sensing camera in automotive OE (Original Equipment) market will see considerable growth in 2018, driven by the development of smart vehicles in high-end market and the establishment of regulations in the U.S., the EU, Japan and China. The shipments of sensing camera in automotive OE market are expected to reach 121 million units in 2018, a year-on-year growth of 63% compared with 74 million units in 2017.“The soaring demand for sensing cameras is attributed to the development of autonomous driving”, says Yvette Lin, analyst of TrendForce. Driven by advancements in artificial intelligence, communication and sensing technology, many technology companies and traditional car makers have invested in the R&D of autonomous driving. Consumers also show increasing concerns for active safety, which push the demand for advanced driver assistance system (ADAS) and sensors.Currently, car makers adopt different ADAS sensing solutions, including millimeter-wave radar, ultrasonic radar and automotive camera, etc. Particularly, camera-based solutions are gradually accepted by car manufacturers since breakthroughs have been made in image recognition algorithms and capabilities of image processing chips. Camera-based solutions, which can detect the traffic around vehicles through image recognition, are now applied in both cars with ADAS and autonomous-driving vehicles in testing.According to Lin, current mass produced cars with ADAS carry an average of 4 to 8 cameras per car. After the launch of highly-autonomous vehicle in 2020, the number of cameras embedded in each car will increase to 10 to 12. In this trend, major camera manufacturers across the world have been actively deploying in the automotive market, including Chinese companies Sunny Optical and Sunex, Taiwan-based Asia Optical and Calin, and Korean manufactures Sekonix, who have been shipping products to the first-tier car makers.In addition to the development of smart vehicles in high-end market, the establishment of regulations for vehicle safety in the U.S., the EU, Japan and China also drives the rapid expansion of market. Since 2016, forward collision warning (FCW), lane maintenance system (LDW), automatic emergency braking system (AEB), and blind spot detection system (BSD) have been mandatory for vehicles or included in the New Car Evaluation Standard (NCAP) in areas like the United States, the European Union, and Japan. Particularly, China has for the first time included a number of evaluation criteria for active safety in the 2018 version of NCAP. As the largest market of cars in the world, China witnesses increasing demand for sensing camera, which will boost the global market for automotive sensing camera. TrendForce estimates that the shipments of automotive sensing camera will reach nearly 124 million units by 2020.
2018-06-13 00:00 reading:426
Four big shifts in automotive design and usage are beginning to converge—electrification, increasing connectivity, autonomous driving and car sharing—creating a ripple effect across the automotive electronics supply chain.Over the past few years the electronic content of cars and other vehicles has surged, with electrical systems replacing traditional mechanical and electro-mechanical subsystems. That has been a key driver for semiconductor growth, and autonomous vehicles are the poster child of this effort. But the emergence of this market also will result in profound technological and sociological changes.From the design side, this is already apparent. Automotive electronics fall into the realm of functional safety, which previously was limited to medical devices and military/aerospace applications. Vehicle manufacturers are requiring that everyone in their electronics supply chain be certified as complying with relevant standards, which means that chips developed for parts of a vehicle that are not directly tied to safety now must comply with the most stringent regulations.“The ISO 26262 standard sets a high bar for functional verification and elimination of systematic faults, as well as the ability to handle random fault effects in operating devices,” said David Landoll, solutions architect at OneSpin Solutions. “Some EDA vendors are obtaining external certification for compliance to this standard. This makes it easier for their customers, semiconductor suppliers, to meet functional safety compliance requirements and, in turn, for subsystem and vehicle manufacturers to do the same.”SoC designers typically target a 10-year lifetime when it comes to reliability metrics that are based on the current usage model and mission profile, said Thomas Wong, business development director in the IP group at Cadence. “If you look at the usage model today, we drive to work, park our cars, and we drive home at 6 p.m. So you drive about 20 miles to work, park your car for 8 hours, and then drive 20 miles to go home. This is your mission profile. Adopting design constraints to reflect a changing mission profile in the automotive industry is nothing new. Consider police patrol cars or taxis. Their usage model is quite different from how the average person uses their car. For police cars and taxis, there will be heavy duty tires, beefed up suspensions, better brakes, larger batteries, different gear ratios, stronger gearboxes, and more robust starters, among other things. The main reason for including more robust mechanical and hydraulic systems on these types of vehicles is to make the vehicle last longer. With the upward trend in electric vehicles and autonomous driving, the systems that have to be more robust are not just the mechanical bits. We now have to ensure that all the semiconductor chips and SoCs that are truly the brains of the vehicles fulfill their mission based on the new usage model and mission profile,” he said.Add to that the combination of autonomous driving and car sharing. “With autonomous driving, you may want to send your car home so someone else at home can use it while you are at work,” said Wong. “Then at 5 p.m. you summon your autonomous vehicle to go to the office and pick you up, and you go home. With electrification, your cost per mile drops, so you are likely to see this scenario becoming a reality. Instead of two 20-mile trips, now your car will travel 4 times 20 miles, for a total of 80 miles per day.”A second scenario could be a car-sharing arrangement, he said. “This may be a driverless car service, and your car is making money for you while you are at the office. Therefore, your car is being used 10 hours per day. Think about the wear and tear on the vehicle. More importantly, how will that impact semiconductors used in the various systems in your car? How will these two scenarios impact semiconductor design and reliability assessment?”With any of these new driving scenarios emerging, more attention must be paid to use cases that were not a concern in the past. That brings in chip foundries, which now must develop process and design rules that are more robust to withstand this new level of use. And that, in turn, translates into more robust transistors, new materials for metallization, better aging models, along with more stringent guidance on design for reliability (DfR) and design for manufacturing (DfM), Wong said. “Designers may need to work more closely with foundries to understand failure mechanisms. Extended reliability models need to be developed to enable EM/IR analysis, and there must be considerations to improve SoC reliability and robustness, such as accommodating larger via coverage and a methodology for implementing redundant vias.”Then, requirements stipulated in AEC-Q100 must be revisited to determine if this specification needs to be updated to reflect the intensified usage models resulting from car sharing and autonomous vehicles. “We are already seeing the impact of these trends. Semiconductor foundries have deployed automotive-qualified processes. Design for reliability and design for manufacturing rules have been created. Chip companies have invested in training their engineers to be conversant in functional safety. ISO 26262 and ASIL-readiness are the new must-have buzzwords. Automotive OEMs and fabless companies are learning how to build more robust SoCs that are needed as we approach Level 3, 4 and 5 autonomous vehicles—redundancy, lock step, active safety features, functional safety verification, ASIL-ready IP blocks, more advanced EM/IR tools and more advanced fault injection tools are being deployed to keep pace with the fast-moving trend toward a driverless world.”Higher bandwidth requiredAlongside these shifts is a concurrent shift toward more connectivity. While much of the attention initially was focused outside the vehicle with vehicle-to-vehicle and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications, there is an increasing amount of attention being paid to moving huge volumes of data around inside of these vehicles. Automotive cameras, radar and LiDAR will be generating streaming video data, and at this point it’s uncertain where all of this data will be screened and processed. But one thing that is clear is that large amounts of data will have to be moved quickly for autonomous vehicles to avoid accidents.“It’s clear to the automotive industry that legacy networking solutions in the car were really challenged from a bandwidth and security perspective moving forward looking into next generation architectures from 2020 to 2025 and beyond,” said Tim Lau, senior director of product marketing for automotive Ethernet at Marvell. “That’s why the entire automotive industry has really started to look at other technologies and most specifically realized that the optimal solution for high bandwidth network connectivity in the car is automotive Ethernet.”This, in turn, is causing significant changes inside the automotive industry. It affects what OEMs and tier-one suppliers look for, as well as how they engage with other companies in the supply chain for next-generation ECUs, said Lau.Processing requirements changingAll of that data has a significant impact on the processing requirements for automotive systems, as well. “As more decisions are made by a vehicle rather than a driver — which is becoming a requirement for some ride sharing robo-taxis — then more intelligence, and hence processing performance, is required in the vehicle’s computing platforms,” saidRobert Day, director of automotive solutions and platforms for the Embedded & Automotive Line of Business at Arm “In some cases this leads to more centralized vehicle computers that take large amounts of sensor information and do the detailed perception and decision processing, which leads to the actuation function required to take action.”So there is a big jump required in performance, but it still has to within the strict power, space and thermal requirements of a modern vehicle. “Other designs are pushing the perception function closer to the sensor, with the central computing engine making decisions based on information that is fed from the intelligent sensor nodes,” Day said. “In both cases, increased computing performance is required without compromising the power available in a vehicle, which leads to higher performance application CPUs provided in multi-core clusters, with additional acceleration engines such as GPUs, vision processors and machine learning processors all being built into automotive SoCs. All of these compute functions also need higher levels of safety, as the decisions and actions must be held to the same or higher safety levels as driver-initiated functions.”Fig. 1: Compute functions required in autonomous vehicles. Source: ArmAnd while the ISO 26262 standard is discussed freely, there are additional regulatory or safety concerns that must also be captured in semiconductor design IP.“In addition to the ISO 26262 second revision that will be released later this year, and all the other established functional safety standards like IEC 61508, IEC 61511, EN 5012X series, DO-254, etc., a new regulatory framework is emerging. This is called SOTIF (Safety Of The Intended Function), which will be released under the ISO naming PAS 21448. The aim of this document is to cover the validation and the verification of systems with complex sensing and algorithms, whose limitations in performance could cause safety hazards in the absence of a malfunction. While most of the activities defined by this new guideline are at the vehicle and system level, these will have a direct effect on the requirements for SoCs and IP, driving the capturing of performance requirements directly to be allocated on these elements,” Day noted.Advanced nodes play a role in automotiveThere are additional impacts on the semiconductor design process from the automotive ecosystem that is barreling down the road to autonomous and connected, electric vehicle sharing.“We are starting to see companies planning to do tapeouts on 7nm (the most advanced finFET node today), and they are planning to do automotive chips on that technology,” said Navraj Nandra, senior director of marketing for the DesignWare Analog and MSIP Solutions Group at Synopsys. “That’s very surprising because typically people think about automotive as very stable, using technologies with very long development and qualification cycles. But that whole supply chain has totally been redone because companies like Nvidia, for example, are now providing chipsets into the automotive industry. But they’re not coming from the traditional automotive supply chain, so they’re not encumbered with all that huge overhead that the traditional suppliers have had to follow. For them, they need the latest and greatest in a very short timeframe, which has been typical of the consumer market.”So from an IP standpoint, automotive is driving the next generation of technology nodes, Nandra said. “As well, the amount of software and digital implementations in automotive chips has grown phenomenally. What this means is that with the digital part and the software part, you’ve still got to meet all of the functional safety requirements. People used to talk about failure-safe functional safety in the context of semiconductor chips, and now it has to do with your software, which is a very interesting topic. How do you make your software that sits on your SoC that drives some of the IP blocks functionally safe to meet the ISO26262 requirements?”Reliability, security requirementsAdvanced automotive applications have additional requirements beyond what many other customers do in terms of their reliability needs, or testability needs, Rob Aitken, Arm Fellow, pointed out. “For reliability, it’s divided into categories liked soft error immunity and how it performs over time, which can include how the circuit ages. Those are requirements that are often less strict than some other areas. For example on an automotive design, if it is going to sit in the car and the expected lifetime is 10 or 20 years, then you need to make sure that the memory will have enough residual performance that, as it ages and the device performance degrades, it is still going to work.”Increasingly, there is also the security requirement. That’s both a research topic as well as a practical application for many designs and encrypted memory. “Depending on the application, you don’t want somebody being able to steal the data,” Aitken said. “From an SRAM standpoint, that’s not always important because the chance that somebody is going to break in and steal your SRAM data is low. First of all that’s really hard to do. And second, it’s not obvious for a lot of IOT-ish applications why anyone would want to do that. But for things like DRAM, there have been situations where somebody actually freezes the DRAM chip, they take it off the board and decrypt it at their leisure. In those situations, if the contents of the DRAM are encrypted, you get useless information. But if they are in plain text, you get all kinds of interesting stuff.”Not all of this has to be done from scratch, though. Market segments including networking and enterprise servers have the same kinds of reliability requirements as automotive.“Based on the quality that is required in those networks, the equipment chips in networking must run for 10 years, so a long life,” noted Frank Ferro, senior director of product management at Rambus. “We’ve already developed our IP for very high extended temperature ranges, and have done extensive testing, so it was an easy step to move into the automotive market. The requirements are very similar, and in some cases the automotive requirements were maybe not even as stringent, depending on the types of certification as some of the networking markets.”The opportunities in the automotive segment in general also are driving suppliers to rethink technology in other ways, and how it can be applied here. One such area is data mining and data analysis. Automotive brings some of the most complex system design challenges to multidisciplinary engineering teams, and as such, all of the stops must be pulled out to be a success here.“The challenge now is not only automotive, now you not only have to verify that a design works properly, you have to flip it on its head and simulate/emulate improper behavior of the design so that in the cases that it might actually happen, the design can be modified to be able to gracefully exit from an error,” said Mark Olen, a product marketing manager at Mentor, A Siemens Business. “The mathematician in me says this is an N squared problem, and I’ll be really curious to see as we try to tackle this at what sigma level [designs get to.] Everybody realizes it’s really not practical to truly prove 100% quality, but can you do 99.9999%? The economics start playing out there at some number of one in some million. But now what happens when you’re talking about a whole network of flying cars that are self-driven?”Further, the only way to solve some of these problems algorithmically on the road to fully autonomous vehicles is with neural networks or non-deterministic algorithms, said  Kurt Shuler, vice president of marketing atArterisIP. “However, that is combined with functional safety, so there must be bounds because this is F=MA, and there is a heck of a lot of M in a car, and at times there is also a lot of A, too. There are real time constraints on this and it includes the traceability problem. Everybody says with software the system will get better, but then the question becomes, ‘Oh, you changed the software, you changed the system. Now you’ve got to have that car go and get certified to get running through that track all by itself.’ Is the industry going to do that? No. There is a lot that we need to do prior to this really being real.”This shift in thinking includes determining the best way to have the system perform the actual computing.“The advent of the autonomous driving sector portends, in many ways, a return to the past while making a clean break in others,” said Srikanth Rengarajan, vice president of products and business development at Austemper Design Systems. “Correct computing, for instance, has always been the assumed imperative with no variance or tolerance for deviation. DSP and similar tasks were largely ancillary tasks. In the car, the bulk of the processing for, say an ADAS chipset, is heuristic in nature. The dominant neural algorithms are based on stochastics and tolerance and deviation is assumed. For a chip designer, this shifts the focus from absolute correctness to approximate computing. Total accuracy is sought via system-level cross-checks, multi-channel computing and modular redundancy providing greater leeway to the chip designer. Since no system is completely fail-proof, designers shifted left to fail-safe, again by resorting to probabilistic interpretations of correct operation,”Nowhere is this more apparent than in the functional safety segment, where incorrect operation is tolerated so long as it is probabilistically limited or can be detected within a failure tolerance interval. This approach is being ingrained into the industry via the ISO26262 and related standards, Rengarajan said.Supply chain disruptionsGiven the number of moving pieces in the connected, electric, autonomous car-sharing model, in addition to solving the technical challenges, there may be business ramifications as well.“The pace of innovation for autonomous systems is increasing dramatically, which is very much changing the delivery time for new silicon for the automotive industry,” said Arm’s Day. “This change could be seen as disruptive to the supply chain, and could possibly lead to new players in the market. The growth in the amount of software in a vehicle as autonomous functions are introduced also means that Arm needs to understand and support that new ecosystem, ensuring that these huge software stacks are optimized for the Arm architecture and looking at new functions that Arm can produce to increase the performance and efficiency of the system.”While some believe the industry has the horizon in its line of sight, Magdy Abadir, vice president of marketing at Helic, pointed out that the full brunt of any of this has not been seen yet. “Automotive has always been an area where people are worried about reliability and safety,” he said. “Historically, it’s been more about higher quality standards, higher reliability standards, more risk-averse and conservative in adopting new technology. This is because of the fear of some disaster happening, which could end up costing someone’s life or the liability is too high and the warranties are too expensive.”As the technologies continue to be developed and refined, stringent standards, requirements and specifications will be put in place such that by the time connected, electric ride-sharing cars are ready, semiconductor and systems designers will have worked many of the kinks. But at least for the foreseeable future, big shifts will bring other shifts, and the result will be both significant and widespread.
2018-04-09 00:00 reading:302
How could a tiny island nation with only one local car OEM possibly become the next hub for the global automotive industry? Taiwan is nursing just such an expectation, with precedents to buoy its hopes. Today, Taiwan’s industrial success is rooted in the PC and smartphone markets. So, the template for this small nation’s transformation to automotive importance is already established. Taiwan’s ambitions, of course, seem like a pipe dream, according to assessments by automotive industry analysts and based on Taiwan’s virtually non-existent role in the automotive market. Mike Demler, senior analyst at The Linley Group, bluntly noted, “Honestly, I can’t think of anything for which Taiwan is known in the automotive industry.” Ian Riches, director for the Automotive Electronics service at Strategy Analytics, agreed. “Taiwan is not a major player today in the automotive industry.” In Riches’ mind,“Taiwan’s most globally established company in the automotive field is likely TSMC,” a foundry behemoth for many automotive semiconductor vendors. Phil Magney, founder and principal advisor for Vision Systems Intelligence, was a little more kind. “I know of some electronic components coming out of Taiwan for infotainment, lighting and some other areas.” But he added, “I do not think they have enough experience to build the integrated safety systems and meet the stringent functional safety requirements.” Admittedly, Taiwan is at a very early learning stage in the automotive market. Paul Chou, secretary general of Taiwan Telematics Industry Association, however, isn’t discouraged. Taipei International Auto Parts & Accessories Show this year has attracted 1,080 exhibitors (Source: Taitra) During an interview at Taipei Ampa, the International Auto Parts and Accessories Trade show this week, Chou recalled the birth of PCs. “The PC industry then was very fragmented," he said, "and things were very chaotic” -- just like the auto industry today, on the cusp of rolling out highly automated vehicles. In the PC world, once Microsoft’s Bill Gates began pushing Windows and Intel’s Andy Grove promoted the X86 processor architecture, efforts to build PCs coalesced around the Wintel platform. Then, Taiwan hatched its plot for the PC market -- perhaps faster than any other nation. In the following five years, startups sprang up all over Taiwan, many of them engaged in developing and putting together everything from I/O, motherboards to mouse, keyboards and everything else that goes into a PC, explained Chou. Taiwan created a solid ODM business for the PC industry. Now it commands 90 percent of global notebook PC production. Taiwan also became a key supplier of quality components for the PC market, and later did it again with the smartphone market, noted Chou. Big acquisitions like Intel’s buying Mobileye and Qualcomm taking over NXP/Freescale underscore the consolidation and partnerships emerging and accelerating in automotive. Chou believes it’s time for Taiwan to replicate a successful business model — which worked in the information and communications technology industry — in the auto sector. Chou told a group of reporters: “Taiwan won’t be absent from the coming autonomous driving market.” Taiwan’s automotive play But how, really, do Taiwan’s aspirational goals match reality? What automotive-related products does Taiwan make today? Chou pegged Taiwan’s automotive-related business output to be about $19.5 billion in 2016.  Of this, $6.5 billion comes from domestic car production, $6.95 billion is contributed by parts and components manufacturers, and $6.07 billion from vehicle electronics.
2017-04-21 00:00 reading:357
  • Week of hot material
  • Material in short supply seckilling
model brand Quote
TPS5430DDAR Texas Instruments
TXB0108PWR Texas Instruments
PCA9306DCUR Texas Instruments
TPIC6C595DR Texas Instruments
TPS61021ADSGR Texas Instruments
TL431ACLPR Texas Instruments
model brand To snap up
TPS61256YFFR Texas Instruments
TPS61021ADSGR Texas Instruments
TXS0104EPWR Texas Instruments
TPS5430DDAR Texas Instruments
ULQ2003AQDRQ1 Texas Instruments
TPS63050YFFR Texas Instruments
Hot labels
Information leaderboard
  • Week of ranking
  • Month ranking
About us

Qr code of ameya360 official account

Identify TWO-DIMENSIONAL code, you can pay attention to

AMEYA360 mall (www.ameya360.com) was launched in 2011. Now there are more than 3,500 high-quality suppliers, including 6 million product model data, and more than 1 million component stocks for purchase. Products cover MCU+ memory + power chip +IGBT+MOS tube + op amp + RF Bluetooth + sensor + resistor capacitance inductor + connector and other fields. main business of platform covers spot sales of electronic components, BOM distribution and product supporting materials, providing one-stop purchasing and sales services for our customers.